Now Richard Wong compared them all on his youtube channel. As usual, I’ll provide a summary for you guys in case you don’t have time right now to watch at the 22 minutes long video.
Summary
Design and Built Quality
all manual focus only with no electronic contacts
all full metal construction
they all feel very solid
Mitakon and 7Artisans size and weight is similar. The Laowa is quite a bit bigger and heavier
The Laowa feels a bit front heavy on X-T3
Mitakon and 7Artisans, when you change focus distance, the high of these lenses will extend a bit. The size of the Laowa always remains the same
Only Laowa comes with lens hood, a metal lens hood. But the lens cap is of plastic
7Artisans and Mitakon have a focus throw of 90 degrees, while the Laowa has a much longer focus throw of 270 degrees
Laowa focus ring feels smooth but also a bit tight. Changing from closes distance to infinity, it will be hard to do it quickly on the Laowa. Not a problem with the other lenses
7Artisans has a quite loose focus ring, so it can be tricky to focus very precisely when shooting at f/.095
all these lenses have an de-clicked aperture ring, which he hates. Non of his videographer friends ever changes aperture while shooting a video. He’d prefer a clicked aperture ring
he prefers the design of the Laowa
Field of view
Laowa has the widest field of view (33 instead of 35)
Sharpness
Center at f/0.95: Laowa is clearly the sharpest, followed by Mitakon and the last is 7Artisans
at f/1.4 all lenses improve contrast
corner sharpness at f/0.95: all quite soft, but Laowa is the sharpest and borderline usable
corner sharpness at f/1.4 is reasonably sharp, while you must stop the Mitakon and 7Artisans down at f/2 to get similar results of the Laowa at f/1.4
Chromatic Aberration
at f/0.95: Laowa is the best with only a little bit of aberration, and much better than the other two lenses. Mitakon still keeps chromatic aberration at a decent level. 7Artisans has noticeably more chromatic aberration than the other two lenses
LoCA at f/0.95: serious color fringing on the 7Artisans. Laowa is best. Mitakon only marginally worst than the Laowa
Vignetting
at f/0.95, the Laowa is worst, followed by Mitakon and 7Artisans is best
it’s surprising, as the Laowa is the biggest lens
Bokeh
at f/0.95: Laowa has smoothest and most creamy bokeh, Mitakon a bit of halo, on 7Artisans pretty noticeable halo which makes it look more nervous
bokeh balls: Laowa pretty round a bit swirly in the corners. Mitakon relatively round in the center, but in corners a weird triangle shape. 7Artisans bokeh a bit similar to Mitakon but not quite as extreme and corners have oval shape bokeh with pointy end
Distortion
overall similar and noticeable barrel distortion
Focus distance
similar minimum focus distance of 35/37 cm
at close distance, Laowa has softest sharpness, Mitakon in the middle, and 7Artisans is the sharpest at close distance
Flare
All have quite some lens flare and contrast drops
lens flare looks quite different
7Artisans is best with least amount of lens flare, but the Laowa has the best and very cinematic looking lens flare with lots of character thanks to a red lens flare
Sun Stars
from f/8 to f/11: Laowa most beautiful. Also 7Artisans has nice sun stars. Mitakon not quite as clean sun stars
You can stop down the Laowa only until f/11, while 7Artisans and Mitakon go until f/16
Mitakon and 7Artisans have quite a bit of ghosting when shooting at f/16, so while the sun star is a bit sharper compared to Laowa at f/16, the ghosting can become a bit distracting
Laowa and 7Artisans are a good choice
Coma + Focus Breathing
Laowa Coma is at acceptable level. 7Artisans has slightly more coma. Mitakon is the worst
Laowa and Mitakon similar focus breathing, 7Artisans more focus breathing
Final Thoughts
Each of the lenses has Pros and Cons
7Artisans best value for money, Mitakon overall balanced design and reasonably well in most areas
Laowa is his favorite. It’s the sharpness of all and has lowest amount of chromatic aberration, making it most usable at f/0.95
Laowa renders best bokeh and lens flare
Laowa has way too long focus throw
He would pick the Laowa, even if it is larger and heavier
It is optically close to perfect, with sharpness being definitely its super-power. In fact, Fujifilm itself said that with this lens they did focus on resolution to make it fit for “future higher resolution cameras” (aka Fujifilm X-H2).
I know, some might say that lenses are more than just sharpness. And I get the point. I mean, I totally love my XF35mmF1.4, which probably isn’t the sharpest Fujinon X mount lens out there, but has an overall vibe in the images that some describe as “magical”, and indeed, it took some of my favorite images ever.
But if what you need is the ultimate sharpness, then look no further, as the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 might just be what you were looking for.
Hold on a second… there was one thing I wanted to say.
I did handle the Fujinon GF100-200mmF5.6 at the store, and was surprised that it is actually so light, hence definitely portable for my hikes in the Dolomites.
However, I did put the purchase of that lens on hold, as in 2021 I already bought the XF80mm, XF27MKII, GFX100S and GF32-64, and it’s getting more and more tricky to convince my wife that we really need yet another lens.
And things have not become easier after Fujifilm launched a massive rebate on guess which lens? Exactly, the GF100-200!
For the sake of my bank account health I am still resisting, but Fujifilm keeps up fighting for my money, this time by dedicating their latest Focus on Glass episode to the Fujinon GF100-200mmF5.6.
Well, I’ve watched the episode, and here is what Fujifilm engineers and managers say about this lens:
Fujifilm wanted to make a tele-zoom suitable for handheld shooting
they needed to develop a smaller and lighter lens
at planing stage, they set their target at 1 kg
the lens has 5 stops OIS
this makes handheld shooting easier
Fujifilm hopes you will use this lens to take images that you have never experienced before with a 35mm format lens
with GF teleconverter it covers up to 221mm (35mm equivalent)
during the development tests, Fujifilm has conducted repeated toughness tests
it is a rugged lens while maintaining lightness and compactness
although it’s a zoom, resolution is superb and able to resolve the high megapixel of GFX cameras over the entire zoom range and even at f/5.6
in order to make the lens brighter and still have higher resolving power, a greater number of elements in the lens are required
but the more elements you use, the more the lens gets bigger
that’s why Fujifilm designed ever lens element to be as thing as possible
every effort to save size and weight was made
the engineer is proud of the final result
you can easily shoot handheld in places where you can bring a tripod
Fujifilm designed a small focus lock mechanism to fit in the lens
toughness test were contacted to overcome weaknesses on by one
But was is triggering my GAS more then what the managers and engineers said, is the photographers and their work shared inside that video. Definitely check it out in the video down below.
ZP productions tested the GFX100S and GF80mmF1.7. He loves both, and owns both.
But there is one note he makes.
He says that when Fujifilm launched the GFX system a few years ago, it had sheer perfect lenses. But he noticed that with the latest lens releases, Fujifilm traded in a bit of that perfection to release less perfect, smaller and more affordable lenses.
In this context, he compares the GF110mmF2 to the GF80mmF1.7, the first one being expressions of Fuji’s perfection, the second one, while still being excellent and he actually totally loves to shoot with it, just not being just as perfect as the GF110mmF2.
I’ll make a summary down below of his 17 minutes long video below and would love to hear what you guys think about it.