Sony DGO vs DCG Sensor – The Pros and Cons – And What Would You Like on Fujifilm’s 6th Generation Cameras? – VOTE

DGO vs DCG

After our in-depth article on Sony’s new DGO sensor, other websites have finally started to pick up the topic.

But their coverage is still incomplete — missing key details (and some serious drawbacks) that photographers absolutely need to understand in order to use this new technology to its full potential.

Why these points are being glossed over is unclear, especially since they’re crucial for Sony A7V users who could unknowingly lose up to 1 stop of dynamic range compared to the older A7IV if they’re not careful.

So let’s break down the pros and cons in a quick overview. And if you haven’t yet, give our main article a read — it clearly explains the difference between DGO (Dual Gain Output) and DCG (Dual Conversion Gain), which is essential to understanding this debate.

DGO advanatges

• Excellent dynamic range at low ISO

DGO limitations/downsides

• No DR benefit above ISO 400/500
• No DR benefit at all with electronic shutter
• Up to 1.5 stops DR loss with e-shutter compared to mechanical shutter
• the old Sony A7IV gives you about 1 stop more dynamic range than the brand new Sony A7V between ISO400-800 if you use electronic shutter, because on the A7V dual gain kicks in only at ISO1000 (vs ISO400 on A7IV

So, just be aware that there is no DR benefit when using electronic shutter and if you use ES in values between ISO400 and ISO800, you actually lose 1 stop of dynamic range over the older Sony A7IV

The Fujifilm Sensor Future

Sony is not keeping this technology to themselves.

In fact, the first mainstream hybrid camera to use a Sony DGO sensor wasn’t a Sony at all — it was the Panasonic S1II.

And since that sensor is already available on the market, I see no reason why Fujifilm couldn’t buy and use it as well.

So the real question becomes: what would you prefer for Fujifilm’s 6th-generation cameras — a DGO or a DCG sensor?

If you rely heavily on the electronic shutter, DGO might actually work against you. In the best case you get no benefit at all, and in the worst case you could lose up to 1 stop of dynamic range at certain ISO values.

But considering that high-end Fujifilm APS-C bodies already reach (for now) 15 fps with the mechanical shutter (compared to Sony’s 10 fps), the need for electronic shutter bursts is far lower on Fujifilm cameras anyway.

Personally, I’d be happy with either. I’m already “cheating” dynamic range via DR200/400, so both systems work for me. But if I had to choose, I’d take DGO if that still gives me access to DR200/400 — especially on GFX, where it could allow even higher pixel densities and higher base dynamic range, turning it into the ultimate high-resolution / high-DR platform.

My prediction?

I would not be surprised if DGO would soon become the industry standard. Nikon, OM System, Canon, Fujifilm — everyone will adopt it sooner or later.

But enough from me — let me know what you prefer by voting in the poll below.