Fujifilm Hong Kong says: Fuji X-E2 Firmware 4 coming mid-January!

Share

 photo FW4 e2_zpsghxx4qxu.jpg

X-E2 Firmware rumor recap

  • After the announcement of X-T1 FW 4.0, Fujifilm France answered to X-E2 shooters on May 25, that there will be a Firmare update also for X-E2 – READ HERE
  • Sources told to FujiRumors on June 3, that this firmware update will come in about 6 months – READ HERE
  • On June 18, a new source told us it will indeed come by the end of this year, and bring the new AF-system – READ HERE
  • Finally, Fujifilm itself confirmed on July 24: the X-E2 firmware will come by the end of the year. They did not mention which features it will bring, though – READ HERE
  • On October 29, a trusted source told us, that the new Firmware update for X-E2 will come, and it will bring a new AF-system to X-E2 cameras. READ HERE

Still not convinced? Then here is another one:

Fujifilm Hong Kong (via Fujfilm Studio) just said on facebook, that the X-E2 FW4 is currently scheduled for next year mid-January. Earlier this year, my sources and even Fujifilm itself said it will come by the end of this year. If Fuji Hong Kong is right, than there has been a little delay on the release.

Thanks a lot for the FR-reader who spotted and shared this with all of us :)

stay tuned,
Fuji X Forum, Facebook and Twitter

Share

Meyer Optik Görlitz announces Trimagon 95mm F2.6 lens… also for Fuji X mount

Share

Bildschirmfoto 2015-11-11 um 16.08.45

Meyer Optik Görlitz  launched the Trimagon 95mmF2.6 lens. It will be available also for Fuji X-mount. The lens is expected to ship in Summer 2016, but there is still no price available.

Check out the complete Fuji X Mount lenses available now (or soon) for your X-series camera here.

Technical specifications:
Aperture & Focal Length: f/2,6-22; 95 mm
Lens construction: 3 elements in 3 modules
Picture angle: 25 °
Filter Diameter: 52 mm

Characteristics:
Lens construction in classical triplet | 3 lenses / 3 groups
Iris diaphragm with 15 specially constructed aperture blades and special anti-reflective coating
Mounts: Canon, Nikon, Fuji X, SonyE, MFT, M42 and Leica M
Available from early summer 2016

via mirrorlessrumors

Share

Fuji X-Pro2: No Tilt Screen (trusted Japanese source) + Updated X-Pro2 Vs. X-T2 Flagship Battle Poll!

Share

 photo no tilt screen_zpsbgeky7bw.jpg

According to what the top trusted Japanese source told me, the Fujifilm X-Pro2 will NOT feature a tilt screen.

From the comments shared on FujiRumors in the past, I know that some will applaud this decision, others won’t. I remember this older Poll, launched when the X-T1 still had to be announced, where 32% of the FujiRumors readers wanted an X-T1 without tilt-screen.

So here are two polls:

  1. The first is about how important the tilt screen in the X-Pro2 is for you.
  2. The second one is an updated flagship battle Poll X-T2 Vs. X-Pro2, considering this new rumor. Sensor, AF-performance and Firmware overall would remain the same between X-Pro2 and X-T2. Main differences: the X-T2 won’t have an OVF, be cheaper, have a better grip etc, while the X-Pro2 will have the hybrid viewfinder, no tilt screen, rangefinder design etc.

Best Camera for Travel photography...

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Best Camera for Studio Work...

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

TRUSTED
– APS-C sensor (TS + AS + AS)
– 1/8000 of a second mechanical shutter speed (TS)
coming late 2015 (TS + AS)
– delayed to 2016 (TS)
– Coming after CES (TS)
– Announcement on 15th Janaury 2016 (TS)
– weather sealed (TS)
– 4K video (TS + NeS)
– Faster Processor EXR III (TS)
– No Tilt Screen (TS)

SOURCE RIGHT IN THE PAST
– Sync Speed faster than 1/180th (SRP)
– coming in January 2016 (SRP)

NEW / ANONYMOUS SOURCE
– 24MP sensor (AS) – More than 16MP (AS)
– about the same size of current X-PRO1 (NeS)
– dual SD card slot (NeS + AS)
– tilt screen (AS)
– WiFi (AS)
– Price about 20% to 30% more expensive than the X-T1 (AS)
– Two X-PRO2 version, one 24MP APS-C and one 25-27 MP APS-X, compatible with XF/XC lenses (NeS + OS)

OTHER SITES
coming September / October (OS + OS)
– Non organic APS-C X-Trans sensor (OS)
– smaller than X-PRO1 (OS)

Share

POLL: Do you want a New Battery for X-Pro2 or keep the same NP-W126 battery of the X-T1 (& CO)?

Share

 photo PRO2 BELIEVE_zpshcohlu7k.jpg

We recently discussed the quality of several third party batteries in this post. There are some very good alternatives to the expensive original Fuji batteries, like Patona, Wasabi and the Watson (and more suggestions in the comments). These batteries are small & cheap. I own 4 of them, so I never have to worry about battery life on my X-E2 / X-T1. Problem solved!

But I’ve heard some in the FujiRumors community asking for a new, longer lasting battery for the X-Pro2.

I thought it would be nice to let you vote on this topic. Should the Fuji X-Pro2 feature a new, improved battery, or keep the same Fujifilm NP-W126 battery, so you’ll be able to use the same batteries you already own for the X-T1, X-T10, X-E2 & CO?

Feel free to drop your vote:

Best Camera for Sport Photography...

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Get rid of the cables, with this little cool Adapter for $6.25!

 

Share

From Nikon to Fuji X-T1 or Sony A7rII? “Better colors, more lenses, 1/32,000 ES, faster RAW editing workflow = X-T1!”

Share

When it comes to switching from a DSLR to a mirrorless system, there is one decision that often causes photographers quite a headache: should I get the Fujifilm X-T1 or the Sony A7rII?

Last summer I’ve played for three days with the Sony A7rII, and wrote my impressions here. Well, I’m happy to see that I’m not the only one, who would go for the X-T1 because of the better colors, the wider selection of lenses, the painfully slow RAW editing of the A7rII files and more.

Guam Photography decided to get rid of his Nikon D4. So he borrowed the X-T1 & the A7rII and tested them.

Speaking of lenses, he compares the XF56mmF1.2 with the Zeiss 85mmF1.4 (with LA-EA4 adapter because, so says the reviewer, “right now Sony doesn’t have really any great portrait lens“) and the XF16-55mm with the Sony 24-70mm.

He tested it in his typical shooting situation (portrait), and saw, for example, that the images coming from the 16MP APS-C X-T1 + XF16-55mm are actually sharper than the one of the 42MP A7rII with Sony 24-70mm.

At the end he goes for the Fujifilm X-T1 because:

  • RAW file sizes is smaller – editing worflow is quicker [look at the video at minute 9:45 and see how long the the A7rII needs to load]
  • the max. shutter speed of the A7rII is only 1/8000. X-T1 has an electronic shutter of 1/32000. No ND-filter needed to shoot wide-open in daylight.
  • Fuji has better colors
  • Fuji has better white balance
  • Fui has great selection of high quality lenses
  • best value for Image Quality [for the price of the A7rII body only, he can get an X-T1 and a couple of primes]

Of course this is just his personal opinion. The X-T1 is the better choice for his needs and for his bank account. There is no “right” or “wrong” answer. But at least he motivates his choice after testing both cameras in his typical shooting environment (portraits), and decided that, despite the on paper superior specs of the A7rII, the results he gets from the Fuji X-T1 are better (for his needs/personal taste etc.)

Full video here on youtube

via FR-facebook photostream
Highlight: X-T1 using the 50-140mm, cracking lens, soo sharp !!!!!!!!

Share