miXed zone: Fuji VS DSLR and Leica T, Zeiss 50mm and Samyang 8mm II first impressions and much more!


 X-T1 or DSLR? Leica T or Fuji X-E2?

 photo Leica_zps1ed8df0c.jpg

Leica T: Adorama / BHphoto

– Fuji X-T1 is better than DSLR, according to soundimageplus: “For me the main reason I use Fuji X cameras is they are just such a pleasure to use. […] I also have no wish to ever use an optical viewfinder ever again […] ultimately the DSLR will disappear. A lot slower than some think it will, but it will. […] The other thing I like about Fuji is that they go their own way. In the early days they did sometimes take a wrong turn, but at the moment they are certainly motoring along strongly. […] So is the Fuji X-T1 better than a DSLR? Well it is for me, not for others. And we all make those decisions based on our choices, our preferences and our wallets and purses.”

Soundimageplus (click here) also thinks about the question: the brand new Leica T or Fujifilm X-E2?: “Now it’s not always about price. But the Fuji lenses are faster, as far as I’m concerned the equal of the Leicas optically plus the EVF is internal. The Fuji also has focus peaking, faster lenses and newer sensor. It can also accept m-mount lenses via much cheaper adapters. For the price difference you could add a 56mm f/1.2 – £899, 10-24mm f/4 – £849 + 55-200mm – £549. And you still have £105 left over to buy a grip and some memory cards or an m>X adapter.”

Jeff Bridges told me via email: “With the introduction of the Leica T, is it safe to say that the company has abandoned the space once owned by the M to the Fuji X? The T seems to go against everything Leica stands for—thoughtful, image-focused, high quality photography. They made cameras for photographers. Now…???

And here is the FF vs APS-C poll… keep up voting.

From all the upcoming lenses in the FR rumored roadmap, I'm mostly looking forward to the...

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Fujifilm X-T1
Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

OM-D E-M1 vs XT1 for Wedding Photography at danielkcheung: “In the end, I chose to go with the Fujifilm X-T; not because it is a better camera – it is not. In terms of ergonomics and autofocus ability alone, the Olympus OMD EM1 wins hands down. However, I do require better low light performance for the purpose of post processing. A larger sensor therefore makes sense in my situation. I am not saying that the OMD EM1 handles high ISO poorly, for a small micro four thirds sensor, it does wonders. However, I am uncomfortable with the results for the amounts that I charge for my services. Secondly, being the very impatient person that I am, I could not bare with how the Olympus OMD EM1 locks the user out from doing anything while the camera writes to the memory card. To me, these two factors were enough for me to look for an alternative.”

LensVid Fujifilm X-T1 Review is now online here (with video): “The X-T1 is the third X camera from Fujifilm that we have tested in the past 2 and a half yeas and there is no debut in our minds that the company progressed considerably over this time period. The most important point in this respect is that Fuji finally created an AF system which good enough that we can recommend (its not the fastest in the world – but its adequate for most day-to-day shooting situations). If we combine this new AF system with the great image quality you will be getting from the X-TRANS sensor (and the new image processor), huge EVF, different focus peeking options, fast shooting speed, cool WIFI (and app), a large number of options to customize the controls, good build quality and retro design (for those who love it – we actually don’t) – you get a very attractive offering.”

– quesabesde X-T1 test here in Spanish (translation): “The formula for success is sometimes simpler than it seems: experience, photographic common sense and an affordable price. Get the ingredients is not easy, but when things come together like this Fujifilm X-T1 certainly lead the best model to date of signature.”

– Fuji X-T1 on the streets at expat-photographer: “Fuji knows optics. Their lenses are amazing. They know color – the straight out of camera jpegs look amazing – with several film profiles to select from. With the new Fuji X-T1 body I’m a happy camper. Is it perfect? No. Is it better than the original Fuji X100? By a longshot. Fuji has learned its lessons and taken its lumps – and improved a great deal.”

– First review FujiFilm X-T1 at frankdoorhof: “Overall conclusion for the moment: AWESOME camera, gives me a lot of fun in shooting with it and that’s what’s very important. The dynamic range and image quality are stunning. […] A great camera for the street and travel photographer.”

– X-T1 at work at danbaileyphoto: “Even after putting it to extensive use during the past two months, this was the was the first really big job that I’ve shot with the X-T1. I feel as if I’ve gotten to know that camera even better now and am even more confident with how well it performs in all situations.”

– Traveling and editing like a boss with a Fuji X-T1 + iPad & Lightroom mobile at jaysonoertel: “I never have to worry about traveling with my clunky DSLR again to shoot a job this size again.  I’m fully confident that I’m able to do my shoot, capture/transfer the photos to my iPad in the field, do some light editing in Lightroom and export them to Dropbox to send off the the client. I’d love to hear your travel tips and workflow.”

– Munya: “Hey Patrick! First off, just want to say I love the work you to bring news to all of us Fuji users. It is really inspiring and keeps us up to date! I recently did a post of my experience with the Fujifilm cameras so though it would be a great read for those looking to consider the system. I use the X-T1 with the X-Pro1 with the 35 1.4R, 14mm 2.8R and just recently acquired the 23mm 1.4R. Here is the link below to my blogpost and website!!”

– Daniel Korzeniewski: “I am just back from Peru, (returned yesterday) took with me the X-T1 and X2, I made an entire assignment there shooting for HOOP Peru, an ONG with just Fuji, and I am very happy with the results, I will never ever travel with DSRL again!!! I’ll be posting photos to my blog soon….”. See the shots and read the story here at danielkorzeniewskiphoto.

– X-T1 with 23mm and 35mm at the Japanese site camera.itmedia (translation).

– Oslo with the X-T1 and 23mm lens at kjetilkvienmadsen.

– FUJIFILM X-T1 + Elmar 3.5cm F3.5 at dc.watch (tranlsation).


– Rob Moroto: “Got the MHG-XT hand grip for the X-T1 on a recent trip to Japan.  Note to everyone who gets it – DO NOT OVER TIGHTEN THE SCREW!  I got mine and instantly snapped the screw connecting the grip to the body. Honestly – turn it lightly and when it stops – STOP.  I did the regular extra 1/8th of a turn for good measure and snap.. I just put a couple photos from my recent trip to Japan using the X-T1 on my Facebook page if you’d like to have a look.  Mostly taken with the 18-55 and the 55-200.”

Zeiss Touit 50mm
 photo zeiss_zps3f9e2a6e.jpg

Pre-order at Adorama and BHphoto

Extended First Impressions: Zeiss 50mm f2.8 Touit (Fujifilm X) at thephoblographer: “Image Quality: So far, we’re really, really liking what the Zeiss 50mm f2.8 Touit lens can do. Here’s what we’re talking about.”

Rokinon (Samyang) 8mm Fisheye Version II
pre-order: BHphoto

First Impressions: Rokinon (Samyang) 8mm Fisheye Version II review at admiringlight: “I’ve only had a chance to put a handful of images through the new lens so far, but at first blush, it appears to be slightly sharper than the first version, producing very crisp images into the corners stopped down a bit.  Chromatic aberration is quite low.”

 XF 56mm f/1.2
Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

– Fujinon 56mm Review at flixelpix: “The 56mm is definitely a people lens, it is perfect for separating the subject of an image from the background but at the same time keeping the proportions accurate and complimentary. I think the reason photographers fall for the 56mm so quickly is the fact it is so easy to control. Shooting at large apertures isn’t easy especially when the subject is always moving yet the 56mm is extremely accurate and picks the focus point accurately with each shot. […] The 56mm is a bokeh machine that is perfect for people photography. It is a joy to use and will be a firm favourite on my X-T1 for sometime to come.”

– The Fujifilm 56mm f1.2 & X Pro1. Quadrophenia Night at may-photography: “This lens is a keeper, I really really like it and will stay fitted to one of my cameras most of the time. The 56mm and 18mm lenses fitted to each body will cover most situations given the type of photography that I do.”

– Open aperture shooting with the Fuji X-T1 and 56mm lens at f/1.2 at aboutphotography: “For this series I only used the 56mm lens at f/1.2. Using it like that forced me to take a point of view that exploited the out-of-focus areas as much as the narrowly focused subject. The character of what the equipment will do at this setting becomes as much a part of the subject as the scene itself. When all the disparate elements are working well they integrate into one flowing visual experience.”

XF 10-24
Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

 photo asd_zpsae3d884a.jpg

image courtesy: Dan Hogman

– Dan Hogman: “Patrick, I’d like to share with you my impressions on the Fujifilm XF 10-24mm 4.0 – It’s really sharp, including corners. Wide angle distortions are really minimum. I am surprised they were able to control it so well at 10mm, when other lenses, including the 18-55mm, have visible barrel distortions. This is especially important for what I do, since I shot mostly architecture, where distortions are really an major factor. I’ve used Sigma 10-20mm, Sigma 12-24mm, Nikon 10-24mm, which I consider inferior on all aspects. I find it very well built, with most parts made out of metal. It’s really compact for what it does, and the fact that it does not extend at zoom is a big plus. I ocassionally post samples at https://www.flickr.com/photos/danhogman/ or instagram @danhogman

– Belfast and Donegal at flixelpix: “I’ve been using the Fujinon 10-24mm as the only lens locked to the Fujifilm X-T1. You can see just how wide you can go with this photograph of Poison Glen in Donegal. You can just spot the church in the left hand side of the frame and this was shot at 19mm!!”


– Fuji Raw -V- Fuji Jpeg at thebigpicturegallery: “My point about raw-v- jpeg debate is that photographers should concentrate on taking a correctly exposed picture first and foremost, and should not rely on raw to save your bacon. Now that I have looked at the raw processing using Lightroom, I am now confident to shoot in either.

Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

 photo DSCF5830_zpsfb2b2b2d.jpg

image courtesy: ehnamour.com

– Arlindo Namour Filho: “Hello PatrickI would like to share with you and the Fuji lovers the impressive results I had with my X-E2 with the XF14mm lens on a street photography tour I had in São Paulo downtown. This lens is a must have for every street photographer. it gives definition, almost zero of distortion and chromatic aberration. I shot all the images in JPEG. The X-Trans sensor combined with the great glass of this lens hang all the quality I need when I make the post production. http://www.ehnamour.com/the-impressive-fujinon-xf14mm. I hope you like it.”  For an engagement session he shot with his little babies Fuji X100S and X-T1 (with the XF56mm f/1.2) click here.

Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

– Street Photography with the Fuji x100s at derrenhodsonphotography: “After a disastrous time with my Canon 5D3, i knew wanted to concentrate on Street Photography, through i call myself an Urban Photographer as i still like to get Architectural and urban objects into my photographs. I decided i wanted to try a light camera, as i was still new to Street Photography a silent leaf shutter would be a great bonus, so i first purchased an X100 then about two weeks later the X100s.”

– Shooting Black & White with the Fuji x100s at nicolestruppert: “The x100s is a beautiful camera – especially for Black & White photography. Most of the time I shoot RAW & jpeg. The jpegs are great out of the x100s but the RAWs have more information and if I am having a “gold keeper” I want to get the best quality out of my picture.”

– Beating Edinburgh’s Streets with the Fujifilm X100s at roblowephoto: “On a recent trip to our nation’s capital, I took both the GXR and the X100s out to have some fun on the streets and, on our return, I had some 200 shots over two and a half days, from the X to go through against just 80 or so from the GXR/50. That tells me something (and I pay attention to things like that).”

Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

 photo 20042014-DSCF0186z_zps31f44587.jpg

image courtesy: Henri Buffetaut

– Henri Buffetaut: “Hello Patrick. Here some volcanic pics taken with my fuji X-E1 with the 35mm f/1.4 and my Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 on the Stromboli. The activity was quite strong with nice explosions every 20 minutes. Hope to return soon in Sicilia. ;) website / My fb page

– Harrison Lam: “Hey Patrick! First of all, great job on the website!  I’ve been reading it ever since my fiance had purchased an X100 and I toyed around with it.  Ever since then, I’ve been hooked on Fuji’s and determined I would get my own. When I finally saved up enough, I purchased an XE-1 and the 35mm lens to go with it.  Since then, I’ve taken 2 vacations to Japan and have used my camera with only the 35mm to take all of my shots.  During my last trip there, I managed to have enough money left over for a 14mm, but since I only had a few days left, I barely used it. I just wanted to showcase some of my work with you.  I’m still a beginner, so I feel like I have a long way to go.  Check out the shots I have at my flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/100322705@N08/ All pics (sans one or two, currently) were taken with my XE-1 and the 35mm.  Enjoy and keep up the great work!”

– One year with the Fuji X-E1 at nils.mipi: “The worst thing about the cam­era: I am really temp­ted to buy more lenses and maybe a X-E2 or an X-PRO2 when it comes out). This cam­era makes me want to throw more money at Fuji, even if I already have all I need…”

– A Glimpse of India at mikeangphoto: “I brought my Fuji X-E1 along with the Fuji 35/1.4 and Zeiss 50/1.7. I could remember a few years back during my trip in Singapore, I was a DSLR user back then, and after bringing it the first day, it was just left in the hotel for the next days as my back and shoulders were already hurting. I never had this experience with the Fuji X. It’s really something you can bring wherever, and you’d be able to focus on taking photos instead of thinking about where the next stop is so you can get some rest on your sore back.”

Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

– More London with the X-Pro1 at martincastein: “The Zeiss Touit 12mm 2.8 came out to play again was excellent. The X Pro 1 is so light with it on.”

– Matt & Clare’s Wedding photographed with an X-PRO1 and 35mm lens at mattwilkinsonphotography.

Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

– Fujifilm X-M1: Lab Test Results & Comments: Still & Video at shutterbug: “The sharpness results are excellent. The camera reproduced the test chart with 3059 lines in picture height, which isn’t far from the nominal sensor resolution (3264 lines per picture height). The standard test box shot and the portrait shot show images that are rich with details and fine structure. […] The video quality is acceptable, but the camera also showed some very disappointing results.”


– On the road with the X10 at alhanoi.

Other Lenses
XF 55-200: Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay XF 23: Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay Zeiss 12 Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay XF 27: Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

– Event Photography with the Fuji 55-200mm lens at notofthisearth: “I would highly recommend the lens to anyone taking their photography seriously with the Fuji X system.  It is compact enough to fit in a small kit bag (I use a Crumpler Long Schlong which has extra room in it waiting for an X-T1 to go in!) and provides all the versatility you could ask for in a telephoto lens.”

– Fujinon XF 23mm f/1.4 R (Fujifilm) – Review / Test Report  at photozone: “The Fujinon XF 23mm f/1.4 R is a highly attractive addition to the Fujifilm lens lineup. It combines an ultra-large aperture with high quality results. At large aperture settings the center quality is already pretty high whereas the borders/corners are at least on a good level. The resolution is much more snappy at f/2.8 and images are tack sharp between f/4 and f/5.6. The low amount of lateral CAs also contributes to the high sharpness perception. Image distortions are nothing to worry about whereas vignetting can be an issue in RAW images at f/1.4 and f/2. However, Fujifilm is relying on image auto-correction so this is usually a lesser issue from a user perspective. Wide-angle lenses tend to produce a quite harsh bokeh (out-of-focus rendition) but the quality of the Fujinon is really good especially around f/2.”

– Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8 (Fujifilm) – Review / Test Report at photozone: “Ultra-wide angle lenses are never really perfect. However, within its scope the Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8 delivers pretty impressive results. The center quality is great and the border and corner quality are good to very good at mainstream settings. The very low lateral CAs contribute to the high sharpness perception. Distortions and vignetting are usually auto-corrected either by the camera or your favorite RAW converter so you don’t have to worry about these aspects from a normal user perspective. However, when looking at the naked raw files, you can spot a few issues. The raw distortions are actually still quite fine at 2% – this is a normal value for such a prime lens and lower than on most conventional zoom lenses for sure. However, the raw vignetting is very high especially at max. aperture.”

– Marcin W. Dąbrowski: “Hi Patrick. I’m writing to you to share my little album — my love shouted at me I should show the photos to you, and you might be interested in sharing them with the Fujirumors community. Anyway, the story goes: About a month ago I was getting home from a business trip, flying from Zürich to Warsaw — having my trusty X–E1 with XF27/2.8 with me in the cabin. The portability and quality of this setup paired with fantastic weather conditions allowed me take some shots of Alps from 8–12 km above sea level. This is just another story how ordinary trip can change to something extraordinary when you have some fantastic quality gear with you — and I must say that XF27 might look like a toy lens, but it delivers outstanding results. PS: The shots were processed through Capture One Express 7.2. The photos are here at 500px

  • amnong

    It’s been a long time since the last Firmware upgrades. Any news if the X-E2 will get some of the X-T1 tricks? Wifi shooting, display improvements, intervalometer?

  • atpc

    Dear Patrick,

    on the “APS-C / Full-Frame” question, can you please ask the question differently again:
    a) assume that the FF camera or lens will cost at least +30% and lens size is +30%

    b) separate answers by actual Fuji users and others
    c) ask: would you _buy_ a FF Fuji + lenses with the price and size plus

    I can barely imaging that so many users of Fuji X really would buy a FF Fuji in that case. If you just ask FF or APS-C most people might not think of the consequences or just want to see competition in that field.
    I would not like bigger lenses.
    For me Fuji X is just the right size how it is right now.

    • MJr

      Also, why does it have to be the X-Pro, i want a X-T1s with organic apsc sensor. ;-) But i guess indeed the Pro is the only camera that can introduce new sensor tech at this point. It’s their show off baby. =)

    • Bob

      Fully agree… plus: In a few years “full frame” probably will just be another sensor size anyway. Maybe by then it would be better to go even a little bit bigger (or stay the same). Just look at the Pentax 645 – why get a measly “full frame”, when I can have a medium format (etc.). “full frame” is a dumb wording anyway.

    • I for one, would LOVE the characteristics of a Fuji w/ Full Frame. The additional light-gathering capability, control over depth of field and bokeh are all important in the way I shoot. The same is true with a lot of pros.

      I love my Fujis, but I still rely on my Nikons for my paying assignments. They are just quicker.

      And I bet FF fuji lenses would be he real leica-killers ;)

    • Jan

      I agree that there is little room for a FF option above the current X-system. I think the question should therefore offer a third option: I wish my X-Pro2 to be APS-C but I wish for an X-Pro Plus that is medium format. Fuji has a long history of producing MF rangefinder cameras. That would be awsome and a real step up from the APS-C X-system!

    • EJPB

      Nope, untrue. If Leica can make tiny, little lenses for FF, Fuji can too. Even with AF-motors & according electronics. Comparing to the DSLR-world is in this case completely wrong because the flange to sensor distance is much larger – having a serious effect on the optical design. The Fuji’s rear glass is very close to the sensor, if not the closest of all systems in the market. I’m not claiming that all XF-lenses are FF, but I’m not so sure not some of them are capable of doing FF and Fuji has already taken this option in account. For instance, the 23mm & 56mm are quite a bit different from all the rest… and it are the two last ones that were released… so?

  • Per K

    About the Leica T: This is a remarkably modern camera, maybe THE modern HQ camera. The user interface is much like a smartphone. I like the simplicity! Reading the Ming Thein review explains how easily the UI is tailored – excellent from the conservative regarded Leica.
    Price is high – but the housing is acceptable priced as manufactured in such way and in Germany. Lenses are very expensive, but the quality of the lens and the image output is on the same level as the M lenses.
    I own a Toyota but many buys BMW that costs three times more – for a reason.
    Being a former Leica film user and worked with IT, the T is interesting. Being a former Fuji X E1 user being not happy with the paper-made (sorry all Fujistas but I prefer the solid build of Oly EM5 for instance) housing and unnecessary many buttons (fake retro) – the T is interesting.
    However it lacks a) a lot of lenses, b) image stabilization. = Not on my list
    A Fuji system is on my evaluation list, but it is currently the most expensive alternative. It also lacks a medium tele (about135mm equiv.). I hope for something from Fuji at Photokina.

    • MJr

      I agree, it’s very exciting to see Leica being innovative again since basically forever. While the digital M’s were more like the postercard of ignorance. I love rangefinders, but there’s so much about the M’s that ‘could have been’. And now with the T they (finally do) go radically modern. Somebody with a mind of this age must have convinced somebody high up in there, and i thank him for it.

      I bet it was Jony Ive who said while working on the limited edition M “And you know what would be great for you guys …”, “no, what is it?” -Dr Kaufmann answered. And the rest is history.

      If you don’t like the T now, it’s a least a sign that they’re still capable of something great, and this is just the beginning. Maybe they will put some more effort into downsizing the digital M to the compact size of the final analog MP, which may be the ultimate goal. Mechanical Perfection is what it stand for and it took many decades, then things went digital and they’ve basically had to start over. But now this T might just be a big step forward even though it’s not an M, it’s quite interesting for sure.

      • Frankly, I don’t see any innovation on the Leica side; from my perspective T looks more like a bold attempt to catch up (with Fuji, which is rather funny). A progress? Definitely. Innovation? Nope.

        • GorgonEmpire

          Agree, there is F’ all innovation about this Leica Coke Can T. So they strap an iphone like touchscreen interface on the back. Melt some coke cans and mill it out and stick recycled X Vario parts and lens elements because the X Vario didn’t sell and they think this is innovation? LOL

        • hexx

          Trenton, I guess you’ve got it wrong – Leica doesn’t need to catch up – they just need to stay relevant. People who buy Fuji don’t buy Leica, it’s as simple as that. They have their own customer base and it’s that customer base (and possibly their younger relatives) they want to target.

          Innovative bit is surely the UI – there’s no camera on the market with such accomplished touch based UI as this T. Let’s not confuse innovation with invention.

        • MJr

          Really don’t see how this is ‘catching up with Fuji’. They’re going in a completely different direction! In fact it couldn’t be more different. Catching up with modern times most definitely, but Fuji? No way. And i’m glad because we certainly don’t need another Canikon catfight, and they can’t all be gifted with the genius that is Fuji. ;)

          It’s completely different from anything ever done before, while progressive without losing intuitiveness. That is being innovative whether we
          like what they did or not. I can’t believe how many seem to just ignore
          that it’s a radical turnaround for Leica, and just for them, but even as a way to do
          Photography in general. Though Samsung did something similar, the package as a whole results in a much more refined product, rather than some experiment. I’m sorry, love it or hate it, they ARE being innovative here and that is interesting at the very least.

      • tim

        Its interesting, different, brave and like the M its for people who want to _take_ photos rather than play with buttons. What amazes me is that the body is _cheaper_ than the X-Pro1 was at release. Lenses are not so cheap however!

        Any case, different camera, different market …

      • ronin

        What exactly is “innovative?” The camera features are basically me-too, other than manufacturing technique.

        The stark design is derivative from the original Nikon V1 of 3 years ago- empty surface plains, few controls, pricey materials, soviet industrial style. The V1 was panned because it had too few controls. When Leica does it way later, that is ‘innovation.’

  • GorgonEmpire

    How many polls do we need. FujiFilm need to bring in a FF option. Its that simple. Which will accept your APS-C Fuji lenses as well, in crop mode. Nothing revolutionary. But covers appeal right across all the user groups.

    Leica T — I though the ‘T’ was for Titanium. Instead we get aluminium. And no built-in EVF = Fail. F’ slow zoom lenses also a fail. Looks to me they recycled th Vario X parts into this joke camera.

    • EJPB

      The Leica T seems to be made for the Steve Huff & other Leica-oriented forum addicts. The ones that would buy anything whenever it wears the red Leica dot – in their own opinion they will never go wrong by doing so. That’s fine for me, but I start encountering a bit the same phenomenon in the Fuji X world. And here’s my call: please don’t get into this kind of a completely ridiculous brand-name fan mode, the reality from the X100 to the X-T1 has been that not one release has been faultless, going from serious technical issues to true design mistakes. Most of all, the X-trans RAWs show after 2 years still artifacts in most convertors, we have to keep Fujifilm sharp to deliver what we users want for our invested money. That is first of all not buying everything by new every 1-2 years. For most serious advanced photographers & professionals it also means the expansion of the current range toward a more mature, powerful, compromise-less pro-FF range – likely meaning to abandon the current problematic X-trans CFA concept that didn’t bring anything spectacular but only a lot of problems. I would say, Fuji, beat Nikon/Canon/Sony FF DSLR’s and the mirrorless A7’s/Leica M’s of this world in a credible, equal, fully credible manner – all the rest is of no importance.

  • DanS

    For consumers who believe in racial superiority, there is NO competition among camera manufacturers. It’s a moot point. If some high-profile manufacturer charges three times as much for equal quality, the company only has to sell 1/3 as many cameras to break even.

    • DanS

      ++Fuji X++

  • Plextor

    Damn… That Zeiss 50mm /2.8 Macro looks great… Someone want to buy my fuji 6àmm/2.4? :-)

    • EJPB

      No. The 60mm is the poorest and most ridiculous investment you could ever made. I call it the ‘hit and miss’ lens. Another great experiment by Fujifilm to sell something that was not completely out of R&D.

      • nwcs

        No, that would be beanie babies. The 60mm is a fabulous lens overall as long as you aren’t trying to get action shots.

        • EJPB

          Well, a lens is an investment, something you want to keep in your bag for a very long time. Optically the 60mm is OK, but be honest: nothing to write a book about, it’s good, period. I don’t know what you mean by “action shots’, but regarding AF, please, this lens is just a joke on my X-Pro1 when you don’t have the very best light conditions. Stupid me I’ve thrown money at it, reading all these reviewers that let it appear as a miracle. Precisely that is what I wanted to express in my further post – don’t get into a ‘Fujifilm is the best brand of the world and can’t ever do wrong’ mode… it’s just not the reality and it’s not right, we need to keep the Fuji engineers and marketeers sharp and also provide honest info to the ones visiting a forum like this. The XF60 was sold to be a ‘portrait + macro’ lens, well, the XF56mm is what this lens should have been, but I’m not going to re-buy all my Fuji-stuff each 2 years again.

          • nwcs

            I just don’t see any lens as an investment. It’s a tool, nothing else, and certainly not a store of value.

          • EJPB

            Why does something in me tells me you are not a true photographer – but somebody suffering from the GAS? Real heard core photographers care about lenses, even very much since it affects their style and won’t sell them on e-bay very easily because there is something new around the block.

          • nwcs

            Lol, quite the contrary. I used to buy a bit more than I needed but cured myself of that a long time ago.

            And I totally disagree with your assertion. Every pro I know (even some well known ones who speak and judge at WPPI) doesn’t spend nearly as much time thinking about their lenses as you assert.

            Lenses are only part of a style, post processing has far more effect.

          • EJPB

            I really think you really need to head to Paris before june.


            This man lived with one camera & one lens, still wrote the lines of modern journalism. Also of ‘street-photography’, if you want – just a modern buzz word for someone capturing life around him. He didn’t require post processing or any artificial means to make ‘his style’, most of all, most present Magnum photographers still don’t do. Even cropping a picture was a sin (and still is, in my eyes). Yes, a Leica lens is something you still own when you die for some reason. Precisely that is my point: Fuji isn’t even thinking to save us from serious follow-up investments, year after year. My fear is that any XF-lens is ready for cheap e-bay offering within now and two years. If you like this, well I don’t.

          • nwcs

            Just curious, how do I know you’re a real photographer instead of an internet comment typer only?

          • EJPB

            The answer is… almost 40 years of photography & 30 years of information engineering. An explosive mix. In both also a bit of an old-timer now.

          • nwcs

            LOL, I’ll be there before too long. Decades of software development and photography here. Personally, I’d love to visit Paris. I speak some French. But I’m just not a fan of street photography. I prefer wildlife mainly.

            I’ll amend my statement. A lens can be an investment in your abilities/potential but it isn’t a sound financial investment and one shouldn’t look to camera equipment as a stable or reliable source of funds. In almost all cases it’s a losing proposition.

  • john

    with the emergence of Leica T touch screen interface, hopefully Fuji will incorporate touch screen into their next generation of Fuji X camera system.

  • hexx

    Once they hit stores I will go and try the new T. The UK price is £1350 (X-T1 is £1050) – that’s not a lot for a Leica body! Also, all reviewers out there agree that the T zoom is actually brilliant piece of glass, sharp corner to corner at any aperture and focal length.

    Just to explain: I don’t use anything else on my cameras than exposure related controls (ISO, Aperture, Shutter Speed, shutter release button) so this new T is very straight forward and simple tool to use with the addition of having all that other fluff in menus – no buttons to press by mistake. And touch + playback of capture + pinch to zoom is the way to go. If it can produce comparable results at ISO3200 as my X-Pro1, I will get it.

    • hexx

      one thing though – all samples I’ve seen so far don’t seem to be very convincing

    • harry lime

      Just keep on taking pictures with you iphone.

  • Derek_V

    The EVF for the new Leica T costs 40 percent of the T body …
    Claims that body is cheap …
    Lenses with lesser specs cost twice as much as Fuji XF prime lenses …

    Leica at its very worst.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

What are Cookies?
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that is stored in a temporary location on your computer to allow our website to distinguish you from other users of the website. If you don't want to accept cookies, you'll still be able to browse the site and use it for research purposes. Most web browsers have cookies enabled, but at the bottom of this page you can see how to disable cookies. Please note that cookies can't harm your computer. We don't store personally identifiable information in the cookies, but we do use encrypted information gathered from them to help provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allow us to improve our site. You can watch a simple video from Google to find more information about cookies.

Cookies used by our Website
The Fujirumors website, Fujirumors.com, uses the following cookies for the collection of website usage statistics and to ensure that we can . These are anonymous and temporary. By using our website, you agree that we may place these types of cookies on your device.
Read how Google uses data when you use our partners' sites or apps: http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/privacy/partners/
Google Analytics Cookie Usage on Websites: https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/analyticsjs/cookie-usage?csw=1#cookiesSet Addthis cookies: http://www.addthis.com/privacy.
Disqus cookies: https://help.disqus.com/customer/portal/articles/466235-use-of-cookies.
Vimeo cookies: http://vimeo.com/privacy.
Youtube cookies: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/171780?hl=en-GB

Disabling/Enabling Cookies
You have the ability to accept or decline cookies by modifying the settings in your browser. Please note however that by deleting our cookies or disabling future cookies you may not be able to access certain areas or features of our site. For information about how to disable cookies in your browser please visit the About Cookies website.