XF 55-200 first look by Tony Bridge


 photo 55-200_zps37a2af21.png

image courtesy: Tony Bridge (Fujifilm X-E1, Fujinon 55-200mm)

It’s autumn in New Zeland, and Tony Bridge went with his pre-production 55-200 to his favorite place to take some pictures in the dawn. Read the in field test of Tony Bridge at his website here. I’ll post just a short extract:

“Fitted to either an X-Pro 1 or X-E1, it sits nicely in the hand and balances well, and the fit and finish is Fuji-superb […] The stabilisation really works, and I found myself able to handhold at 1/50 second in damp and unpleasant circumstances. […] The scene I photographed is rich in micro-detail, including power pylons, farmhouses, trees of various species and fine lines from intense agriculture. They are guaranteed to test any lens, and I wondered if the lens would deliver what I was the asking of it. It did. […] the lens is sharp right out to the corners, and contains a remarkable sense of three-dimensionality. The files required little or no sharpening, and micro-detail requires little or no extra work. If anything the lens is a little too sharp, and I found myself applying softening in places to create a greater sense of distance-reality. Colouration too seems a little on the cool side, but it is particularly responsive to reds and yellows. […] I was more interested in how the lens would cope in the field, how it would resolve detail, its flare and contrast characteristics, and above all whether it had that indefinable X factor, that sense of character and colour and light and space which marks a truly great lens. It has all of them. In spades.”

Preoder the lens at BHphoto, Adorama or DigitalRev.
Check the in stock status in your country: Amazon, Adorama, B&H, eBay

  • Valentino

    Very encouraging report. However, the full articles reads that you used f/11. I would expect f/8 to be closer to the sweet spot not f/11. Also, comments/test wide open at both ends would be very useful. Anyway, thanks for the post and stopped way down it looks like I would expect. I just done understand any comment that says ‘a little too sharp’ :)

  • Zachery

    Wow, what an epic vapid fluff piece. The average quality of content on the Internet just dropped several points. I wonder if this guy also sells $500 stereo knobs on his days off. Or perhaps it was just outsourced to “Malawi or Kyrgistan” :-p

    I’m sure the lens will be fine (and I will be buying it), but, this is some really cheesy crap writing going on here with no meaningful information and zero backing with evidence for any of the minor details that are communicated.

    That said, it’s pretty much par for the course with pre-production lenses. If you’re not allowed to show the performance, then why write anything at all? I’ll tell you why they do it: So they will get the next pre-production lens as well.

  • David

    So the sharpness is just as good as “the worlds fastest autofocus” on the x-100s……

    I dont believe people that get paid by Fuji anymore.

    • Chuck

      Why be so cynical gents? Perhaps he really does like the lens. Being effusive does not mean you’re not objective or genuine in your reviews. I’d like more scientific data as well, but Fuji wouldn’t allow that on a pre-production lens and you ought to know that.

  • I just want to know a release date!

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

What are Cookies?
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that is stored in a temporary location on your computer to allow our website to distinguish you from other users of the website. If you don't want to accept cookies, you'll still be able to browse the site and use it for research purposes. Most web browsers have cookies enabled, but at the bottom of this page you can see how to disable cookies. Please note that cookies can't harm your computer. We don't store personally identifiable information in the cookies, but we do use encrypted information gathered from them to help provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allow us to improve our site. You can watch a simple video from Google to find more information about cookies.

Cookies used by our Website
The Fujirumors website, Fujirumors.com, uses the following cookies for the collection of website usage statistics and to ensure that we can . These are anonymous and temporary. By using our website, you agree that we may place these types of cookies on your device.
Read how Google uses data when you use our partners' sites or apps: http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/privacy/partners/
Google Analytics Cookie Usage on Websites: https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/analyticsjs/cookie-usage?csw=1#cookiesSet Addthis cookies: http://www.addthis.com/privacy.
Disqus cookies: https://help.disqus.com/customer/portal/articles/466235-use-of-cookies.
Vimeo cookies: http://vimeo.com/privacy.
Youtube cookies: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/171780?hl=en-GB

Disabling/Enabling Cookies
You have the ability to accept or decline cookies by modifying the settings in your browser. Please note however that by deleting our cookies or disabling future cookies you may not be able to access certain areas or features of our site. For information about how to disable cookies in your browser please visit the About Cookies website.