<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X PRO 1 firmware updated explained at Henrys. And cool photos by John Smith.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/</link>
	<description>Fuji digital camera news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, would basically be the same. For Fuji an interchangeable mount means at least the chance of selling more than one lens. So maybe fixed isn´t that attractive for them anymore. At least at sub Sony RX1 pricetags ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, would basically be the same. For Fuji an interchangeable mount means at least the chance of selling more than one lens. So maybe fixed isn´t that attractive for them anymore. At least at sub Sony RX1 pricetags <img src='http://www.fujirumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 10:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the X-E1 with the yet to be announced 27mm pancake lens will come close?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the X-E1 with the yet to be announced 27mm pancake lens will come close?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still, is there any news on the x100´s future? Do newer builds still have that sticky blades problem?
I really like the idea of a fixed 35mm (equivalent) lens, carry-all-day camera and the X100 almost had me sold - because I was hoping for a X200 at Photokina.
The X100 won´t suddenly make worse images as before &quot;the new guns&quot; had arrived, but in digital days, who want´s to buy &quot;old&quot; hardware...;)
So, any news?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, is there any news on the x100´s future? Do newer builds still have that sticky blades problem?<br />
I really like the idea of a fixed 35mm (equivalent) lens, carry-all-day camera and the X100 almost had me sold &#8211; because I was hoping for a X200 at Photokina.<br />
The X100 won´t suddenly make worse images as before &#8220;the new guns&#8221; had arrived, but in digital days, who want´s to buy &#8220;old&#8221; hardware&#8230;;)<br />
So, any news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right, Lucas. And it shoots like an X-Pro1. Pale? No, not really. I am interested in this little camera as a backup to my X-Pro1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, Lucas. And it shoots like an X-Pro1. Pale? No, not really. I am interested in this little camera as a backup to my X-Pro1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[X-E1 is half the price and half the weight of the D600. And with a comparable lens it&#039;s still half the price of the RX1. Not that pale I would say]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X-E1 is half the price and half the weight of the D600. And with a comparable lens it&#8217;s still half the price of the RX1. Not that pale I would say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuji&#039;s new stuff paled compare to Sony RX-1, and Nikon D600....nothing to look here, move along...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuji&#8217;s new stuff paled compare to Sony RX-1, and Nikon D600&#8230;.nothing to look here, move along&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renato S.</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Renato S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 04:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Fuji could at least allow Manual controls in Video mode.

In body Image Stabilization would also be nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Fuji could at least allow Manual controls in Video mode.</p>
<p>In body Image Stabilization would also be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on Fuji, it is time for a full frame sensor now.

Sony RX-1 showed us what we need already. I have put my pre-order in already, and my X100 is on ebay now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Fuji, it is time for a full frame sensor now.</p>
<p>Sony RX-1 showed us what we need already. I have put my pre-order in already, and my X100 is on ebay now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YES YOU’RE RIGHT ME TOO ! Pleaaaase Fuji get rid of this aperture dance and give us the Q…]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES YOU’RE RIGHT ME TOO ! Pleaaaase Fuji get rid of this aperture dance and give us the Q…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/x-pro-1-firmware-updated-explained-at-henrys-and-cool-photos-by-jihn-smith/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=730#comment-1514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good on Fuji and good on the spokesperson.

But in the future Fuji must get things right out the box. Updates are good but the word on the X-pro1 spread like wild fire and to me if they released the X pro1 now including its goodness then they wouldn&#039;t have to work on the imminent X-pro2 which will be arriving soon. So they are paying for that.

I have to say I am looking forward to the X-pro2 but stress it must include the 6 axis gyroscopic image stabilisation that the OMD has. If it doesn&#039;t im buying the X-E1 as a cheap and powerful camera rather then an expensive camera body lacking quality features.

I would like wi-fi on the camera too. eye-fi is all well and good but if the Sony NEX6 can do it then so should the X-pro2.

but im seriously tempted but the X-E1. hope its £800 max body only.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on Fuji and good on the spokesperson.</p>
<p>But in the future Fuji must get things right out the box. Updates are good but the word on the X-pro1 spread like wild fire and to me if they released the X pro1 now including its goodness then they wouldn&#8217;t have to work on the imminent X-pro2 which will be arriving soon. So they are paying for that.</p>
<p>I have to say I am looking forward to the X-pro2 but stress it must include the 6 axis gyroscopic image stabilisation that the OMD has. If it doesn&#8217;t im buying the X-E1 as a cheap and powerful camera rather then an expensive camera body lacking quality features.</p>
<p>I would like wi-fi on the camera too. eye-fi is all well and good but if the Sony NEX6 can do it then so should the X-pro2.</p>
<p>but im seriously tempted but the X-E1. hope its £800 max body only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 9/13 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 297/299 objects using apc

 Served from: fujirumors.com @ 2013-05-23 01:07:59 by W3 Total Cache -->