Comments on: New Lightroom and Camera RAW updated (support for XF1, X-E1 and F800) http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/ Fuji digital camera news Fri, 24 May 2013 11:09:16 +0000 hourly 1 By: apw100 http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/#comment-2861 apw100 Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:24:35 +0000 http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=813#comment-2861 Silkypix is certainly better than the Adobe products as far as conversion quality goes, but it is a terribly designed piece of software. The interface is straight out of the late 1990′s and is not intuitive. Basically I hate it.

]]> By: apw100 http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/#comment-2860 apw100 Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:22:34 +0000 http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=813#comment-2860 I didn’t really expect any improvement in RAW conversion in this update. Hopefully by the beginning of the year we will see something substantial.

]]> By: Kuishinbou http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/#comment-2359 Kuishinbou Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:52:47 +0000 http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=813#comment-2359 How is Silkypix for conversion? Does it have strange artifacts, colour smearing, or loss of detail? My understanding is that I could convert the RAW files in Silkypix, and then after minor adjustments (white balance, exposure, etc) save it as a TIFF file and perform further work in Photoshop/Lightroom.

I am considering getting the Fuji X-E1 to replace my Canon DSLR, but would only do so if the RAW files can be converted at the full potential of the sensor. If there is image quality degradation, due to software companies’ inability to demosaic the RAW image properly, it would likely be a waste to get one.

I have tried the X-pro 1 in a store recently and the Jpeg files that I saved are impressive ~ love the sharpness of the images produced without the low pass filter. However, I would not want to shoot Jpeg regularly…

]]> By: Conan http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/#comment-2228 Conan Thu, 04 Oct 2012 02:43:52 +0000 http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=813#comment-2228 Yes raw conversion was the first thing I tried out – still poor.

Back to silkypix till they fix it – it’s a shame too doing everything in lightroom would be so handy.

]]> By: marco ricci http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/#comment-2207 marco ricci Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:00:37 +0000 http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=813#comment-2207 No, same as before, and still no colour profiles..

]]> By: Ty http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/#comment-2203 Ty Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:59:12 +0000 http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=813#comment-2203 I have yet to try it out myself, but from reading around different sites this morning, It seems as though it has not been fixed/improved yet :(

]]> By: Fred http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/#comment-2196 Fred Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:02:30 +0000 http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=813#comment-2196 @David :
No changes so far in lightroom for Xpro-1
Same watercolor effect with raw.

]]> By: David http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/#comment-2192 David Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:09:54 +0000 http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=813#comment-2192 Anybody tried this out yet with the X-Pro1? Any improvement on RAW conversions?

]]> By: Markus http://www.fujirumors.com/new-lightroom-and-camera-raw-updated-support-for-xf1-x-e1-and-f800/#comment-2189 Markus Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:41:42 +0000 http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=813#comment-2189 now i can buy the x-e1 :)

]]>