<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here is the &#8220;low-cost&#8221;  X-E1!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/</link>
	<description>Fuji digital camera news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: shigzeo</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>shigzeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The XPro-1 OVF is pretty poorly thought out anyway - if, that is, you use rangefinder cameras. If you do, you are used to manual focus lenses and a full optical viewfinder. Fuji screwed with this design by only allowing manual focus assist via digital zoom in that covers the entire viewfinder. It cannot be done whilst in hybrid mode, removing the plusses one attached to an optical viewfinder in the first place.

If the XPro 1 would have a small magnification window overlay in the optical viewfinder, or software emulation of rangefinder interposed images, I would take everything back. But they haven&#039;t. Their camera looks like a small MF Fujifilm rangefinder and does&#039;t offer even close to the functionality. For now, the OVF is all for show, which is a big shame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The XPro-1 OVF is pretty poorly thought out anyway &#8211; if, that is, you use rangefinder cameras. If you do, you are used to manual focus lenses and a full optical viewfinder. Fuji screwed with this design by only allowing manual focus assist via digital zoom in that covers the entire viewfinder. It cannot be done whilst in hybrid mode, removing the plusses one attached to an optical viewfinder in the first place.</p>
<p>If the XPro 1 would have a small magnification window overlay in the optical viewfinder, or software emulation of rangefinder interposed images, I would take everything back. But they haven&#8217;t. Their camera looks like a small MF Fujifilm rangefinder and does&#8217;t offer even close to the functionality. For now, the OVF is all for show, which is a big shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The X100 sensor would do nicely - capable of delivering great files.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X100 sensor would do nicely &#8211; capable of delivering great files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MK</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much more likely that this uses a modified version of the X100 sensor, with leaf shutter, than the XP1 sensor. There has to be a maintained difference with the XP1 to justify the pricing and not upset early adopters, and that would be sharpness (no AA filter), low CA and higher ISO sensitivity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much more likely that this uses a modified version of the X100 sensor, with leaf shutter, than the XP1 sensor. There has to be a maintained difference with the XP1 to justify the pricing and not upset early adopters, and that would be sharpness (no AA filter), low CA and higher ISO sensitivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is possible as I have a Leica Vario Elmarit Zoom with a manual aperture ring. It came with the Digilux 3. The camera simply overrided the lens aperture if it was set to 2.8 and zoomed in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible as I have a Leica Vario Elmarit Zoom with a manual aperture ring. It came with the Digilux 3. The camera simply overrided the lens aperture if it was set to 2.8 and zoomed in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Pope</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The white mark is on a smooth part of the lens that is not part of the aperture ring. The grippy surface right below the mark, that is the aperture ring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The white mark is on a smooth part of the lens that is not part of the aperture ring. The grippy surface right below the mark, that is the aperture ring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One More Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>One More Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will this have the same sensor as the X Pro 1?

If so, and if Fuji delivers with the AF, they will have a monster hit on their end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this have the same sensor as the X Pro 1?</p>
<p>If so, and if Fuji delivers with the AF, they will have a monster hit on their end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobar</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iris/A switch is (I suspect) like the A (for Auto) setting on the X100 or X-Pro1 aperture dial. Set it to A and you are shutter priority (and select a shutter speed or program mode (if the shutter speed is also on A).

Fuji X-Fan is right about the zoom, I think. The FL numbers move against a fixed mark (the mark isn&#039;t moving).

Remember this lens will work on the X-Pro1 too ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iris/A switch is (I suspect) like the A (for Auto) setting on the X100 or X-Pro1 aperture dial. Set it to A and you are shutter priority (and select a shutter speed or program mode (if the shutter speed is also on A).</p>
<p>Fuji X-Fan is right about the zoom, I think. The FL numbers move against a fixed mark (the mark isn&#8217;t moving).</p>
<p>Remember this lens will work on the X-Pro1 too &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmm</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>mmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe no physical aperture control because it is variable aperture? I never had an older variable aperture zoom lens, so don&#039;t know how interface is typically handled.

There seems to be a switch for manual or automatic aperture. The innermost ring could still control aperture if the marker for focal length was not connected to that ring, otherwise the other poster&#039;s comment is valid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe no physical aperture control because it is variable aperture? I never had an older variable aperture zoom lens, so don&#8217;t know how interface is typically handled.</p>
<p>There seems to be a switch for manual or automatic aperture. The innermost ring could still control aperture if the marker for focal length was not connected to that ring, otherwise the other poster&#8217;s comment is valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragnarok</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragnarok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lens and all this is the Panasonic L2 that never was! Shame on you Panny. Fujifilm is nailing it with the X range of products. Not perfect products, but a distinct line for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lens and all this is the Panasonic L2 that never was! Shame on you Panny. Fujifilm is nailing it with the X range of products. Not perfect products, but a distinct line for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camaman</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/here-is-the-x-e1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Camaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=606#comment-899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is not a problem. It&#039;s a solution.
The OVF part was for the classic rangefinder users that needed to see one in their new camera. 
Now they invested in a system and saw that it has many, many limitations int he modern camera world, and Fuji is cutting costs and going modern and more simple.

The users will adapt and forget, like they always do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not a problem. It&#8217;s a solution.<br />
The OVF part was for the classic rangefinder users that needed to see one in their new camera.<br />
Now they invested in a system and saw that it has many, many limitations int he modern camera world, and Fuji is cutting costs and going modern and more simple.</p>
<p>The users will adapt and forget, like they always do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 8/14 queries in 0.002 seconds using apc
Object Caching 292/296 objects using apc

 Served from: fujirumors.com @ 2013-05-22 01:23:14 by W3 Total Cache -->