<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fuji manager admits that they may go Full Frame!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/</link>
	<description>Fuji digital camera news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:06:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: you</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-19837</link>
		<dc:creator>you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-19837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony RX1 is smaller than Fuji. Why not X-E3 full frame ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony RX1 is smaller than Fuji. Why not X-E3 full frame ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiwheels</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-8508</link>
		<dc:creator>chiwheels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-8508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must confess I am bemused by this rash assumption that you can plonk a FF sensor into an X mount setting.  Doing the standard calculation, in order to avoid vignetting you need a lens barrel diameter of 65 mm.  I just can&#039;t see it; look at the X pro 1 or X-E1 with the lens removed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must confess I am bemused by this rash assumption that you can plonk a FF sensor into an X mount setting.  Doing the standard calculation, in order to avoid vignetting you need a lens barrel diameter of 65 mm.  I just can&#8217;t see it; look at the X pro 1 or X-E1 with the lens removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dg</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>dg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-1975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al, interesting thoughts there mate with square sensor, I like it! Can it be done, I don&#039;t know. But I do like it and its probably something Fuji could pull off, after all we are starting to expect something a little different from the rest when it comes to Fuji.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al, interesting thoughts there mate with square sensor, I like it! Can it be done, I don&#8217;t know. But I do like it and its probably something Fuji could pull off, after all we are starting to expect something a little different from the rest when it comes to Fuji.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon R</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-1804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[False alarm guys. Fuji may still eventually go full frame but it&#039;s going to require completely new lenses. At this point, I think most of the camera manufacturers are trying to find a way to make a full frame interchangeable mirrorless camera. There were similar interviews discussing full frame mirrorless with the Panasonic and Sony guys.  

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7230565274/fujifilm-shows-off-zoom-lens-on-x-pro1-and-denies-xf-lenses-allow-full-frame]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>False alarm guys. Fuji may still eventually go full frame but it&#8217;s going to require completely new lenses. At this point, I think most of the camera manufacturers are trying to find a way to make a full frame interchangeable mirrorless camera. There were similar interviews discussing full frame mirrorless with the Panasonic and Sony guys.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7230565274/fujifilm-shows-off-zoom-lens-on-x-pro1-and-denies-xf-lenses-allow-full-frame" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7230565274/fujifilm-shows-off-zoom-lens-on-x-pro1-and-denies-xf-lenses-allow-full-frame</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon R</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-1803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s not bad, usually I&#039;ve noticed that cameras in the UK and Europe in general tend to be priced higher than in the North American market. Is there an 18-55 kit available in the UK?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not bad, usually I&#8217;ve noticed that cameras in the UK and Europe in general tend to be priced higher than in the North American market. Is there an 18-55 kit available in the UK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Risto</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Risto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-1793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be great if Fuji would do a full frame camera with controls like in X- series. I hope it would be like X-E1, just with bigger sensor. Those x-series cameras are the only real cameras in affordable price in these digital times. Shutter speed control knob, ring in lens for aperture and focus are all which a real camera needs. If lack of those, that is not a camera at all. Price is not so important if all the controls would be like in real cameras in film era. I still use all the time my film cameras because I don&#039;t like to fuss with all kind of menus etc. Even X-E1 has too many things to search from menus. Still I will buy the X-E1 when it will be available, but I would like to buy also a full frame camera to get all my good old film camera lenses working in their best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great if Fuji would do a full frame camera with controls like in X- series. I hope it would be like X-E1, just with bigger sensor. Those x-series cameras are the only real cameras in affordable price in these digital times. Shutter speed control knob, ring in lens for aperture and focus are all which a real camera needs. If lack of those, that is not a camera at all. Price is not so important if all the controls would be like in real cameras in film era. I still use all the time my film cameras because I don&#8217;t like to fuss with all kind of menus etc. Even X-E1 has too many things to search from menus. Still I will buy the X-E1 when it will be available, but I would like to buy also a full frame camera to get all my good old film camera lenses working in their best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-1792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuji tech is a potential game changer.  I love the &quot;mirrorless&quot; design and function, the EVF, the lenses, and the retention of aperture ring and shutter dial.  the tech produces great dynamic range and perhaps the lowest aberration and clipping.  excellent!  but the resolution is starting to lag behind the competition.  FF is the logical next step.  but this means new lenses.  the current lenses are fabulous, so Fuji can make new ones for FF - but not cheaply.  if it results in a bit larger body, it&#039;s ok for me.  just do not skimp on quality!

I&#039;m curious: does anybody know who makes the imager/sensor for Fuji?  

but, another way to compete is to set a new standard - go square.  scaling the apsc up to a 24mm square imager would create +24mp.  voila, Fuji is now in same strata as top dslr.   the current lenses could cover this area.  square means no rotating the camera for vertical shots, so easier for composing.  at +24mp the IQ would be outstanding.  add a square live-view lcd and achieve total flexibility.  for video, have a button for mode that electronically crops the image to current dimension.  keep tweaking the processor and software to handle the extra resolution. etc.  all can be done, and would give us xpro users some real useful options.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuji tech is a potential game changer.  I love the &#8220;mirrorless&#8221; design and function, the EVF, the lenses, and the retention of aperture ring and shutter dial.  the tech produces great dynamic range and perhaps the lowest aberration and clipping.  excellent!  but the resolution is starting to lag behind the competition.  FF is the logical next step.  but this means new lenses.  the current lenses are fabulous, so Fuji can make new ones for FF &#8211; but not cheaply.  if it results in a bit larger body, it&#8217;s ok for me.  just do not skimp on quality!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious: does anybody know who makes the imager/sensor for Fuji?  </p>
<p>but, another way to compete is to set a new standard &#8211; go square.  scaling the apsc up to a 24mm square imager would create +24mp.  voila, Fuji is now in same strata as top dslr.   the current lenses could cover this area.  square means no rotating the camera for vertical shots, so easier for composing.  at +24mp the IQ would be outstanding.  add a square live-view lcd and achieve total flexibility.  for video, have a button for mode that electronically crops the image to current dimension.  keep tweaking the processor and software to handle the extra resolution. etc.  all can be done, and would give us xpro users some real useful options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomR</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>TomR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 04:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-1791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Everyone, I am new to fujirumors and new to fuji but very impressed by x-e1 (I liked the idea of x pro but I never wanted hybrid VF and x pro was too expensive for me).

So which lenses exactly would work on full frame?  Any that will work on x-e1 - if I do buy in, it makes sense to be at least ready for the possibility of later buying FF.

Shots with 35 1.4 on flickr look great to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Everyone, I am new to fujirumors and new to fuji but very impressed by x-e1 (I liked the idea of x pro but I never wanted hybrid VF and x pro was too expensive for me).</p>
<p>So which lenses exactly would work on full frame?  Any that will work on x-e1 &#8211; if I do buy in, it makes sense to be at least ready for the possibility of later buying FF.</p>
<p>Shots with 35 1.4 on flickr look great to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-1789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blimey.

That only took a week. I think we all knew that Sony would FORCE the industries hand and here is the result.

Fuji film will now rethink their camera line.

I think they will have to keep the X line and release a new line next to it which is full frame.

so you will have the consumer cams, x-cameras, then the new R line of Full Frame cameras of fixed and interchangeable lenses... at a price.

All I can say is &quot;thank you sony&quot; for making a camera to make companies give us full frame cameras.

I just wish for two things:

• Make the focusing speeds super quick

• 6 axis image stabilisation like the OMD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blimey.</p>
<p>That only took a week. I think we all knew that Sony would FORCE the industries hand and here is the result.</p>
<p>Fuji film will now rethink their camera line.</p>
<p>I think they will have to keep the X line and release a new line next to it which is full frame.</p>
<p>so you will have the consumer cams, x-cameras, then the new R line of Full Frame cameras of fixed and interchangeable lenses&#8230; at a price.</p>
<p>All I can say is &#8220;thank you sony&#8221; for making a camera to make companies give us full frame cameras.</p>
<p>I just wish for two things:</p>
<p>• Make the focusing speeds super quick</p>
<p>• 6 axis image stabilisation like the OMD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renato S.</title>
		<link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-manager-admits-that-they-may-go-full-frame/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Renato S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fujirumors.com/?p=770#comment-1788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing I learned from Fuji is that they are all commitment.

They used what they learned from the X100 and X10 to build the X-PRO1 and then with that knowledge they built the X-E1. They constantly listened to their consumers, improving every and each new step.

If they would create a FF X-camera, I don&#039;t know if they would really need the X-PRO1 since the X-E1 covers that whole pretty well. With a FF camera, the photographers with an interest and preference for a Hybrid VF APS-C camera would be basically nonexistent. 

To be honest, I think that with the improvements that have been done with the EVF, I don&#039;t know if a hybrid solution is really needed, that makes the camera bigger. I just wished that Fuji would allow manual controls in video mode.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I learned from Fuji is that they are all commitment.</p>
<p>They used what they learned from the X100 and X10 to build the X-PRO1 and then with that knowledge they built the X-E1. They constantly listened to their consumers, improving every and each new step.</p>
<p>If they would create a FF X-camera, I don&#8217;t know if they would really need the X-PRO1 since the X-E1 covers that whole pretty well. With a FF camera, the photographers with an interest and preference for a Hybrid VF APS-C camera would be basically nonexistent. </p>
<p>To be honest, I think that with the improvements that have been done with the EVF, I don&#8217;t know if a hybrid solution is really needed, that makes the camera bigger. I just wished that Fuji would allow manual controls in video mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 292/296 objects using apc

 Served from: fujirumors.com @ 2013-05-22 16:37:27 by W3 Total Cache -->